Case 2303195/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Dayane Leandro v Syon Technology Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2303195/2021
- Decision date
- 23 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hook Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Dayane Leandro
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Dayane Leandro brought claims against Syon Technology Ltd for unfair dismissal, unpaid holiday pay, and failure to pay a due pension contribution. The hearing took place remotely at London South Employment Tribunal on 23 August 2022 before Employment Judge Hook.
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim as not well founded. It upheld the claim for unpaid holiday pay and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £445.76 gross in respect of that claim.
The pension contribution claim was withdrawn by the claimant after the respondent had made a payment before the hearing. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and it does not set out a detailed written explanation for the outcomes.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £446 |
| Other | Claim concerning failure to pay due pension contribution; withdrawn after the respondent made a payment before the hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £446
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.