Case 2303200/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr David Holder v Streamline (Kent) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303200/2019
- Decision date
- 30 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anne Martin
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr David Holder
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Ashford on 30 September 2019 before Employment Judge Anne Martin. The claimant, Mr David Holder, appeared in person and the respondent, Streamline (Kent) Ltd, was represented by Mr Leach, Operations and General Manager.
The judgment records only that the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £241.00. No separate breakdown of the award is given in the extracted text, and the judgment does not identify which pleaded claim or claims the payment relates to.
The decision also states that reasons were given at the conclusion of the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in writing within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties. On the face of the extracted judgment, the only recorded outcome is the monetary award to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment only records that the respondent shall pay the claimant £241.00. It does not state which pleaded claim the sum relates to or provide the underlying reasons in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £241 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £241
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.