In Person For the v Respondent — 2021

Case reference: 2303203/2020
Decision date: 13 April 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Harrington

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In Person For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Harrington on 13 April 2021, considered the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claims of age, race and disability discrimination. The application succeeded, and those three discrimination claims were struck out.

The judgment did not determine the substance of the unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal directed that the unfair dismissal claim should proceed to a full merits hearing, so there were no findings on liability or remedy for that claim in this decision.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Age discrimination	The respondent's application to strike out this claim succeeded.	Struck out	Age	—
Race discrimination	The respondent's application to strike out this claim succeeded.	Struck out	Race	—
Disability discrimination	The respondent's application to strike out this claim succeeded.	Struck out	Disability	—
Unfair dismissal	The claim was ordered to proceed to a full merits hearing; no merits determination was made in this judgment.	Other	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.