Case 2303226/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Cheeseman v Jennings Racing Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303226/2021
- Decision date
- 19 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Cheeseman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 3 April 2023, the Tribunal gave Miss S Cheeseman an opportunity to make representations by 10 April 2023 as to why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The reasons record that the claimant did not make any written contact with the Tribunal in response to that invitation.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim on 19 April 2023. The hearing listed for 21 April 2023 was vacated. The judgment records no merits findings and no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not set out separate particulars; this claim type is inferred from the case listing category. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not set out separate particulars; this claim type is inferred from the case listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not set out separate particulars; this claim type is inferred from the case listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not set out separate particulars; this claim type is inferred from the case listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.