Case 2303228/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Rawlinson v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303228/2021
- Decision date
- 6 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pritchard JUDGMENT
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Miss R Rawlinson
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claims under case number 2303228/2021 in their entirety under Rule 37. The reasons record that, by a letter dated 10 February 2023, the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why strike-out should not follow because she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 27 October 2022 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations by 24 February 2023 and did not request a hearing. The reasons also record that she failed to appear at a preliminary hearing on 6 March 2023. On that basis, the tribunal ordered that the hearing listed for 24 to 27 October 2023 would not take place. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out the claims under this case number in their entirety under Rule 37. The underlying claim heads are not listed in the reasons. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.