Case 2303229/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Chandler v Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2303229/2021
- Decision date
- 29 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Chandler
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 29 June 2022 at London South by CVP, before Employment Judge Self, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms L Rodgers, solicitor. The judgment records that in case 2303229/2021 the sex discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal.
In case 2303316/2021, the claims of sex discrimination, sexual orientation discrimination, redundancy payment, data protection breaches and notice pay were dismissed upon withdrawal. In case 2303645/2021, the claims of age discrimination, perceived disability discrimination, marriage discrimination and sex discrimination, together with data protection breaches and notice pay, were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The document contains no merits findings, no legal test analysis, and no remedy award. No monetary compensation or other financial order is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
10 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Withdrawn | Sexual orientation | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim described only as data protection breaches; the judgment does not identify a specific statutory basis. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim described only as notice pay; the judgment does not identify a specific legal basis. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment describes this as perceived disability discrimination. |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.