Case 2303235/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Murphy v Canopy Beer Company — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303235/2022
- Decision date
- 8 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smith Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Murphy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Smith therefore made a determination on the papers on 8 February 2023, and the hearing listed for 16 February 2023 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr R Murphy £495.38 gross.
The judgment states that all other claims were dismissed because all sums had been taken into account in the amount awarded. The extracted text does not separately identify those dismissed claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £495.38 gross. | Upheld | — | £495 |
| Other | The judgment says all other claims were dismissed because all sums had been taken into account in the calculation above; it does not identify those claims separately in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £495
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.