Case 2303240/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Kenan McGrath v Behold.ai Technologies Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2303240/2024
- Decision date
- 29 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
- Venue
- London South Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Kenan McGrath
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was for unauthorised deductions from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The hearing was on 1 November 2024 before Employment Judge Tsamados sitting alone. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal refused the adjournment request, noting that the respondent had not provided the further information ordered and had sent witness statements that did not address the substance of the claim, so the hearing proceeded on the claimant's evidence and a payslip dated 31 October 2023.
The tribunal found that the amount properly payable to the claimant for each of November and December 2023 and January and February 2024 was £8,333.33 gross per month and that this was not paid. It also found that employee pension contributions of £146.76 per month for July to October 2023 were deducted from the claimant's wages but not paid over to the NEST Pension Scheme, amounting to £587.04 in total. The claimant's attempt to recover employer pension contributions failed because those sums were outside the tribunal's jurisdiction, being excluded from wages by section 27(2)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and not deductions from wages.
The tribunal therefore upheld the unlawful deduction from wages complaint and awarded £33,920.36 gross in total. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on the payment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded £587.04 for employee pension contributions deducted from wages for July to October 2023 and £33,333.32 for unpaid gross wages for November and December 2023 and January and February 2024. The claim to recover employer pension contributions was held to be outside the tribunal's jurisdiction. | Upheld | — | £33,920 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £33,920
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 27(2)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- what is properly payable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.