Case 2303241/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Bradley v Wm Morrison Supermarkets Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2303241/2020
- Decision date
- 21 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keogh Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Bradley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as a store manager and was dismissed after allegations concerning use of a fork lift truck without a valid licence and moving warehouse racking without following the respondent's procedure. The tribunal found that the respondent's decision-makers held a reasonable belief that the claimant was guilty of gross misconduct, based on his admissions and the health and safety responsibilities attached to his role.
The tribunal found that the investigation and disciplinary process were reasonable. It rejected contentions that the investigation was tainted, that the claimant had a statutory right to be accompanied at the investigation meeting, or that the dismissal or appeal decision-makers had predetermined the outcome. It found that the claimant had been offered accompaniment at the disciplinary and appeal hearings.
The tribunal concluded that dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses given the seriousness of the fork lift truck and racking allegations. For wrongful dismissal, it made its own findings that the claimant was guilty of gross misconduct, so the respondent was contractually entitled to dismiss without notice.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal was fair and dismissed the unfair dismissal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was guilty of gross misconduct and that dismissal without notice was not in breach of contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- range of reasonable responses
- Polkey
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
- gross misconduct
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.