Case 2303241/2022 · Employment Tribunal

D Fakoya v Iceland Foods Limited — 2024

Case reference: 2303241/2022
Decision date: 16 January 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge McLaren

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

D Fakoya

Respondent

Iceland Foods Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal struck out the claim. It had written to the claimant on 16 January 2024 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.

The stated reasons were non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 21 June 2023, as amended by Employment Judge McLaren on 14 November 2023, and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, or did not request a hearing.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The judgment states that the claim is struck out but does not set out separate pleaded claims; claim type is taken from the case listing category.	Struck out	Disability	—
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the claim is struck out but does not set out separate pleaded claims; claim type is taken from the case listing category.	Struck out	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment states that the claim is struck out but does not set out separate pleaded claims; claim type is taken from the case listing category.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.