Case 2303243/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Moya Sancho v The Baguette Deli Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303243/2024
- Decision date
- 19 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Moya Sancho
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss D Moya Sancho, presented her claim in the London South Employment Tribunal on 4 April 2024. The respondent, The Baguette Deli, failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,155 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £220 gross.
The total amount payable was £1,375 gross. The judgment also records that the claimant is responsible for accounting to HMRC for any sums owed in respect of amounts received from the respondent pursuant to the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the tribunal determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. | Upheld | — | £1,155 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £220 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,375
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.