Case 2303246/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gary Wogan v Anytime Repairs Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2303246/2024
- Decision date
- 4 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Gary Wogan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 4 November 2024, the tribunal recorded that the respondent's response had previously been rejected and refused the respondent's application for reconsideration. The claimant accepted that the main claim for unlawful deduction from wages in the sum of £1,152 had already been paid, so the only live issue was the claimed £513 of overtime.
The tribunal found that the claimant had suffered an unlawful deduction from wages in the sum of £513. It also held that the award fell within the definition of earnings in section 62 of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003, so the respondent was required to treat it as wages and account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance. The net amount was ordered to be paid directly to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant accepted that the main unlawful deduction claim for £1,152 had already been paid. The only outstanding wages were £513 of overtime, which the tribunal found had been unlawfully deducted. | Upheld | — | £513 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £513
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.