Case 2303258/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Troop, Counsel For the v Mr A Berk, Solicitor — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303258/2018
- Decision date
- 21 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Troop, Counsel For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis document is a costs judgment dated 15 May 2020, issued by Employment Judge Balogun sitting at London South. The tribunal ordered the respondent, Wine & Spirit Education Trust, to pay the claimant £2,000 plus VAT towards the costs set out in her solicitor's costs schedule dated 12.5.20.
The written record does not set out the detailed reasons for the costs order. It records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested at the hearing itself or by a written request within 14 days of the decision being sent.
No substantive claim outcome is determined in the text provided. The judgment is limited to the costs order and does not contain findings on the underlying employment claims that may have been listed in the case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This is a costs judgment only. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,000 plus VAT towards the costs set out in her solicitor's costs schedule dated 12.5.20. The document does not determine any substantive employment claim on the merits. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.