Case 2303264/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Tar v Lensbury Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303264/2017
- Decision date
- 5 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Tar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment dated 5 April 2019 records that the proceedings in case numbers 2303264/2017 and 2302018/2018 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the Claimant, Ms S Tar. No substantive findings were made on liability, and the judgment does not set out any contested facts or legal analysis.
No remedy was awarded. The judgment is procedural only and reflects that the claims were withdrawn before any merits determination was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the Claimant. The case context identifies disability discrimination as one of the listed claim categories, but the judgment itself does not separate the withdrawn claims further. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the Claimant. The case context identifies unlawful deduction from wages as one of the listed claim categories, but the judgment itself does not separate the withdrawn claims further. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.