Case 2303264/2020 · Employment Tribunal

Claimant v Fox Marketing Services Mc Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2022

Case reference: 2303264/2020
Decision date: 7 February 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Mclaren

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Respondent

Fox Marketing Services Mc Ltd (in voluntary liquidation)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 6 August 2020. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that judgment could properly be entered under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.

The tribunal declared that the respondent had failed to comply with its obligations under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It then made a protective award in respect of all the claimants who were party to the claim and who had been dismissed under section 189(2) to (4) of TULR(C)A 1992.

The judgment ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for the protected period, which was set at 90 days from the date of dismissal, 14 April 2020. The extracted text does not state any separately quantified sums for individual claimants or a total monetary figure.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Redundancy	The judgment made a declaration that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award under section 189(2) to (4) for the claimants who were dismissed. No separate monetary sum was stated in the extracted text.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.