Case 2303294/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Woolard v Omega Homes Ltd (in Voluntary Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303294/2022
- Decision date
- 15 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Woolard
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge determined the claim, or part of it, in accordance with Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that Mrs C Woolard had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded her £5,680 gross in damages. It also found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,990.63 gross.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £568 gross. The total awarded was £8,238.63 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded as damages for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £5,680 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £1,991 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday entitlement was unpaid and the tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum due. | Upheld | — | £568 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,239
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.