Case 2303308/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Adam Ashburn v TSS Facilities Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303308/2022
- Decision date
- 15 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hamour
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Adam Ashburn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hamour sat alone at London South by CVP on 14 March 2023. The claimant, Adam Ashburn, succeeded in a claim of unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of 4 days' pay. The tribunal found that claim well-founded and ordered the respondent, TSS Facilities, to pay £528, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance.
The claimant also succeeded in a holiday pay claim. The tribunal found the claim for 9.5 days' holiday pay well-founded and ordered payment of £1,254, again subject to deductions for tax and national insurance.
A further claim of unauthorised deduction from wages, said to be £44 in respect of private mileage for a work vehicle, failed and was dismissed. The written judgment records that reasons had been given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of 4 days' pay; tribunal ordered payment of £528 less tax and national insurance deductions. | Upheld | — | £528 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for 9.5 days' holiday pay; tribunal ordered payment of £1,254 less tax and national insurance deductions. | Upheld | — | £1,254 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for £44 in respect of private mileage for a work vehicle. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,782
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.