Case 2303309/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Dann v TA Project Independent Lifestyle and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303309/2018
- Decision date
- 15 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cheetham QC
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
4 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Ashford on 11 July 2019, Employment Judge Cheetham QC recorded that the parties had reached an agreed settlement. The judgment states that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The text does not record any findings of fact or liability, and it does not identify any separate monetary award or settlement terms. On the available judgment text, the proceedings were disposed of without a substantive determination of the pleaded issues.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the parties reached an agreed settlement and that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No merits findings or separate monetary award are recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the parties reached an agreed settlement and that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No merits findings or separate monetary award are recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.