Case 2303310/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Hill v Kona Partners LLP — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303310/2018
- Decision date
- 28 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Hill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been served, so the tribunal proceeded under Rule 21. The original respondent, Kona Capital LLP, had been dissolved; by order of 19 June 2019, Kona Partners LLP was substituted as respondent. A postponement request sent on 20 November 2019 was refused, and the hearing went ahead in the absence of the respondent and any representatives.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal found Mr Hill had five years' continuous service and calculated a basic award of £2,540 by applying the then weekly cap of £508. The compensatory award was made up of £6,548.88 for 12 weeks' lost earnings after the notice period, £500 for loss of statutory rights, and £400 for loss of wages and travel expenses incurred attending two hearings. Paragraph 8 states £7,748.88, but the itemised figures and the final total show the compensatory award was £7,448.88.
The separate breach of contract claim for notice pay also succeeded. The tribunal found there was no contractual notice provision and awarded the statutory minimum notice entitlement on the basis of one week's pay for each completed year of service, using a net weekly wage of £545.74, producing £2,728.72. The claim for arrears of wages for May 2018 succeeded in the sum of £2,183, and the holiday pay claim succeeded in the sum of £890. The total payable by the respondent was £15,790.60.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award of £2,540 was awarded separately. The reasons state £7,748.88 in paragraph 8, but the itemised figures (£6,548.88 + £500 + £400) and the overall total show a compensatory award of £7,448.88, which is what is used here. | Upheld | — | £7,449 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of wages for May 2018. | Upheld | — | £2,183 |
| Holiday pay | Arrears of holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £890 |
| Breach of contract | Failure to pay notice pay; the tribunal calculated net notice pay at one week per completed year of service using a weekly net wage of £545.74. | Upheld | — | £2,729 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,791
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,540
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,449
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.