Case 2303314/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Sussex Police Authority — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303314/2018
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short order in the linked cases 2303314/2018 and 2303351/2018 before Employment Judge Hyams-Parish dated 24 February 2020. The order states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimants.
The written record does not set out separate findings of fact, reasons for the withdrawal, or any monetary award. No remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The written order states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimants; this claim type is inferred from the decision's GOV.UK listing categories and is not itemised separately in the order. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written order states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimants; this claim type is inferred from the decision's GOV.UK listing categories and is not itemised separately in the order. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The written order states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimants; this claim type is inferred from the decision's GOV.UK listing categories and is not itemised separately in the order. | Withdrawn | Sexual orientation | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written order states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimants; this claim type is inferred from the decision's GOV.UK listing categories and is not itemised separately in the order. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Victimisation | The written order states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimants; this claim type is inferred from the decision's GOV.UK listing categories and is not itemised separately in the order. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.