Case 2303317/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Forster (Solicitor) For the v Mrs G Williams (Solicitor) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303317/2018
- Decision date
- 19 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Forster (Solicitor) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hyams-Parish, sitting alone at London South Employment Tribunal on 19 November 2019, dismissed both the unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims brought by Miss Bradshaw against Lidl UK GmbH. The judgment records that the claims were not well founded.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days. No monetary remedy was awarded because both claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claim was not well founded and dismissed it. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; no written reasons were provided in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claim was not well founded and dismissed it. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; no written reasons were provided in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.