Case 2303317/2020 · Employment Tribunal

Mr J Umoren v Transport for London and 1 other — 2023

Case reference: 2303317/2020
Decision date: 18 April 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Tsamados Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

Mr J Umoren

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By a letter dated 9 February 2023, the tribunal gave Mr J Umoren an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out because he had not complied with the tribunal's order of 7 October 2021 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.

The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient written representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Tsamados Date struck out the claim in a judgment dated 18 April 2023. No merits findings were made.

The hearing listed for 23 to 26 May 2023 and 30 May 2023 was vacated as a result of the strike-out. No remedy was awarded.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The judgment struck out 'the claim' as a whole. This underlying claim type is inferred from the case listing; the judgment itself did not separately set out the merits of this claim.	Struck out	Disability	—
Unfair dismissal	The judgment struck out 'the claim' as a whole. This underlying claim type is inferred from the case listing; the judgment itself did not separately set out the merits of this claim.	Struck out	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment struck out 'the claim' as a whole. This underlying claim type is inferred from the case listing; the judgment itself did not separately set out the merits of this claim.	Struck out	—	—
Working time regulations	The judgment struck out 'the claim' as a whole. This underlying claim type is inferred from the case listing; the judgment itself did not separately set out the merits of this claim.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.