Case 2303319/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Richards & Others v Kieran Lee Midwinter; Hexis Recruitment Services — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303319/2022
- Decision date
- 12 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Richards & Others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerns multiple joined case numbers, including 2303319/2022, brought by Miss L Richards and others against Kieran Lee Midwinter and Hexis Recruitment Services. The only substantive disposal recorded is that the claims were struck out.
The Tribunal noted that by a letter dated 18 June 2025 it gave the claimants an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out because they had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 18 June 2025 and because the claims had not been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claims. No remedy was awarded and no substantive determination on the underlying claims is recorded in the extracted judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action in the extracted text; it records that the claims were struck out after the claimants failed to make representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 18 June 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.