Case 2303327/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms F Abdulla v ABM Facility Services UK Ltd (sued as “ABM”) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2303327/2021
- Decision date
- 18 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker Representatives
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms F Abdulla
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Ms F Abdulla withdrew her claims of direct and indirect sex discrimination, direct and indirect race discrimination, and unpaid annual leave against ABM Facility Services UK Limited.
Employment Judge Barker dismissed those withdrawn claims. The judgment does not give reasons addressing the merits of the claims and does not record any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant withdrew her claims of direct and indirect sex discrimination and that these claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant withdrew her claims of direct and indirect race discrimination and that these claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as a claim for unpaid annual leave, which was withdrawn and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the .
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.