Case 2303345/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Bowley v Sai Children’s Centre Limited trading as Little Cedars Day Nursery — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303345/2020
- Decision date
- 19 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage Representation
- Venue
- London South Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Bowley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Sage, sitting at London South Croydon on 27 July 2021, held that Ms M Bowley was unfairly dismissed by Sai Children’s Centre Limited trading as Little Cedars Day Nursery. The judgment is brief and records the outcome only, without setting out written reasons, because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a compensatory award of £1,426. The recoupment section records a prescribed element of £976 for the period 20 July to 19 August 2020, with an excess of £450 over the prescribed element. No basic award is recorded in the written judgment, and no other claim outcome is stated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records only that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awards a compensatory award of £1,426. It does not split the award between different claims or identify any separate claim outcomes. | Upheld | — | £1,426 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,426
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,426
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.