Case 2303385/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Gaspar v Robert Gastro Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2303385/2020
- Decision date
- 16 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Gaspar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South by CVP on 16 November 2021 before Employment Judge Self. The claimant, Mr P Gaspar, appeared in person. The respondent, Robert Gastro Limited, did not attend and no response had been entered.
The tribunal recorded that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. It then found that the claim for unlawful deduction of wages was well founded and ordered the respondent to pay Mr Gaspar the net sum of £2,923.08.
The tribunal also found the breach of contract claim well founded. Under that head it ordered payment of £1,107.72 in respect of unpaid holiday pay and £461.54 in respect of notice pay. The total net sum payable under the judgment was £4,492.34.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim was 'dismissed upon withdrawal'. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared the claim well founded and ordered payment of the net sum of £2,923.08. | Upheld | — | £2,923 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal declared the breach of contract claim well founded and ordered £1,107.72 for unpaid holiday pay and £461.54 for notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,569 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,492
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.