Case 2303416/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Dias Maltez v Coveo Solutions (UK) Limited and 1 other — 2026
- Case reference
- 2303416/2024
- Decision date
- 17 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr P Dias Maltez
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal ordered Coveo EMEA Ltd, the Second Respondent, to pay Mr P Dias Maltez £116,483.38. The written judgment records awards for discrimination and unfair dismissal; it does not set out the underlying liability findings or reasoning because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Pecuniary compensation for discrimination covered basic-pay loss, employee pension contributions, overtime, the effect of an April 2024 pay increase, employer pension contributions, internet, gym and education allowances, private healthcare and RSUs. Those items totalled £43,619.06. After deducting £2,549.12 received as payment in lieu of notice, applying a 20% ACAS uplift of £8,213.99 and adding £5,140.80 interest, the pecuniary discrimination award was £54,424.73.
The non-pecuniary discrimination award comprised £16,000 for injury to feelings, a 20% ACAS uplift of £3,200 and £4,012.13 interest, totalling £23,212.13. The combined discrimination compensation before grossing up was therefore £77,636.86.
For unfair dismissal, the Tribunal awarded an agreed basic award of £1,286. It also awarded £500 for loss of statutory rights and a £100 ACAS uplift, producing a compensatory award of £600. The total award before grossing up was £79,522.86.
The Tribunal treated the first £30,000 as payable without deductions and grossed up the remaining net compensation of £49,522.86 to account for tax. Adding the £30,000 tax-free amount to the calculated gross sum produced the final award of £116,483.38.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The official listing categorises the claim as disability discrimination, although this remedy judgment refers only to "discrimination". The claim-specific amount is the discrimination award before grossing up; the judgment does not allocate the overall grossing-up adjustment between claims. | Upheld | Disability | £77,637 |
| Unfair dismissal | This comprises the £1,286 basic award and the £600 compensatory award, including the ACAS uplift, before grossing up. | Upheld | — | £1,886 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £116,483
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,286
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £600
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.