Case 2303430/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Caroline Chileshe v South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303430/2024
- Decision date
- 8 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Othen Appearances
- Venue
- by video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Caroline Chileshe
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Caroline Chileshe brought a constructive unfair dismissal claim arising from events in her management relationship with CO and the Respondent's handling of her grievance and later appeal. The tribunal accepted that the Claimant was distressed by aspects of the process, including an inappropriate proposal that mediation be co-chaired by CO's trade union representative, and that the grievance outcome letter was inaccurate in stating there was no evidence that CO's behaviour was not in line with Trust values or the Dignity at Work policy.
The tribunal also found that the Claimant's grievance appeal was partly upheld in one respect, namely that there had been a mismatch between the grievance outcome letter and the evidence about CO's use of foul language in the 9 March 2023 meeting. However, it held that the underlying investigation was thorough, that the isolated use of foul language occurred in a context of heightened conflict, and that the outcome did not amount, either by itself or together with earlier complaints about delay, mediation, transparency, or impartiality, to conduct calculated or likely to destroy or seriously damage trust and confidence.
Applying the constructive dismissal analysis, the tribunal treated the grievance outcome letter as the final act relied upon, considered whether the Claimant had affirmed the contract by working her notice, and concluded that she had not affirmed it in the circumstances. Even so, it found that there was no repudiatory breach of contract. The tribunal therefore held that the Claimant did not resign in response to a breach of contract and was not dismissed within section 95 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, so the claim failed and was dismissed.
No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Brought as constructive unfair dismissal under s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996. The tribunal found the Respondent's conduct did not amount, individually or cumulatively, to a repudiatory breach of contract or a breach of trust and confidence, and that the Claimant did not resign in response to such a breach. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- Malik v Bank of Credit & Commerce International SA
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
- Waltham Forest v Omilaju
- Wright v North Ayrshire Council
- Quilter Private Client Advisers Ltd v Falconer
- Williams v Governing Body of Alderman Davies Church in Wales Primary School
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.