Case 2303434/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Lupulet v Mike Parnham — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303434/2024
- Decision date
- 27 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Lupulet
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Ms A Lupulet's claim against Mike Parnham. It recorded that by a letter dated 4 December 2024 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to make written representations, or failed to make any sufficient representations, explaining why strike out should not be ordered, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out under rule 37.
The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claim or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Struck out under rule 37 because the claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, after the tribunal's 4 December 2024 letter inviting her to explain why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued; she also did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.