Case 2303452/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Webb-Murray v Dynasty Care Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303452/2022
- Decision date
- 30 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Webb-Murray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 30 September 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
Ms Webb-Murray succeeded on three monetary claims. The tribunal found that she had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £5,076.83. It also found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £7,615.24. The respondent had failed to pay her holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £2,584.56. The judgment states a total award of £15,267.63, although the three individual sums listed add to £15,276.63.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £5,077 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £7,615 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states a total award of £15,267.63, although the three individual amounts listed in paragraphs 2-4 sum to £15,276.63. | Upheld | — | £2,585 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,268
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.