Case 2303456/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr A Greenall and Mrs D Humphries (Directors) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2303456/2020
- Decision date
- 7 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish Members
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal corrected the respondent's name to Royal Herbert Freehold Limited and dismissed all claims against Royal Herbert Management Ltd. The only claim dealt with on its merits was the claim for a redundancy payment, which failed because the claimant was not found to be an employee of the respondent.
The judgment records that all other claims brought by the claimant were dismissed because they had been settled before the hearing. The written record does not set out any separate monetary award or further findings on those settled claims, and it states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal dismissed the redundancy payment claim because the claimant was not an employee of the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment says all other claims were dismissed because they had been settled before the hearing, but it does not identify those claims individually. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.