Case 2303466/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Suter Mrs S Cronin Mrs K Cunliffe Miss N Harvey Ms I Isidore Miss C Knight Mrs M Latham v Chair Of Governors, The London Nautical School and 1 other — 2026
- Case reference
- 2303466/2020
- Decision date
- 21 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs A Suter Mrs S Cronin Mrs K Cunliffe Miss N Harvey Ms I Isidore Miss C Knight Mrs M Latham
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Andrews struck out the claim brought by Mrs A Suter, Mrs S Cronin, Mrs K Cunliffe, Miss N Harvey, Ms I Isidore, Miss C Knight and Mrs M Latham against the Chair Of Governors, The London Nautical School and London Borough Of Lambeth. The judgment was dated 21 April 2026.
The Tribunal wrote to the claimants on 24 January 2026 warning that it was considering striking out the claim under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claim appeared not to have been actively pursued. The letter gave them an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. No reply was received, so the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not identify the underlying claim types, decide their merits or record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim types. It strikes out the claim because it had not been actively pursued and no reply was received to the Tribunal's warning. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.