Case 2303476/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Adjani v Emin Read Solicitors Heard: At London South - remotely (by CVP video link) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2303476/2021
- Decision date
- 10 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Adjani
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Adjani brought a claim against Emin Read Solicitors for unauthorised deduction of wages arising from partial non-payment of bonus attributable to profit costs rendered and received during June 2021. The case was heard remotely at London South on 10 October 2022 before Employment Judge Cox.
The tribunal found that the claimant’s unauthorised deduction of wages claim was well-founded and succeeded. The written judgment does not set out any wider factual findings or legal analysis beyond identifying the unpaid bonus element and recording that the claim succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £838, subject to any required deductions for tax and National Insurance. No separate award components were identified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim concerned partial non-payment of bonus attributable to profit costs rendered and received during June 2021. The tribunal awarded £838 less any required deductions for tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £838 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £838
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.