Case 2303496/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Taylor v Nu Builds and Civils Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2303496/2021
- Decision date
- 17 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr K Taylor
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 22 August 2021. The second respondent failed to present a valid response in time, and the Employment Judge made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that the claimant said his employment had transferred to the second respondent before termination.
The claim against the first respondent was dismissed. The judgment does not set out a separate monetary award against the first respondent.
Against the second respondent, the tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages of £5,600 gross and failure to pay holiday entitlement of £656 gross. The total payable was £6,256 gross. The judgment also records that the claimant is responsible for payment owed to HMRC in respect of tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim against the first respondent was dismissed. The judgment records the claimant's case that his employment transferred to the second respondent before termination, but does not specify a separate statutory claim type for the first respondent in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under rule 21. The second respondent failed to present a valid response on time and was found to have made unauthorised deductions from wages of £5,600 gross. | Upheld | — | £5,600 |
| Holiday pay | Default judgment under rule 21. The second respondent was found to have failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement of £656 gross. | Upheld | — | £656 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,256
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.