Case 2303513/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Morrison v The Island Learning Trust — 2026
- Case reference
- 2303513/2020
- Decision date
- 14 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Morrison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal identified Case Number 2303513/2020, Mrs S Morrison as claimant, and The Island Learning Trust as respondent. On 24 January 2026 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant warning that it was considering striking out the claim because it appeared, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing. The claimant did not reply. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
The judgment does not record any substantive liability findings, any remedy award, or any split between claims. It is a judge-alone decision signed by Employment Judge Andrews on 14 March 2026.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action in the extracted text. The Tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it appeared not to have been actively pursued, and the claimant did not reply to the Tribunal's warning letter dated 24 January 2026 or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.