Case 2303515/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs F Aderele v Outward Housing Trading As Outward Ltd PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303515/2017
- Decision date
- 31 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Mrs R Bailey, Mr P Adkins
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs F Aderele
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in the London South Employment Tribunal before Employment Judge Webster, with Mrs R Bailey and Mr P Adkins sitting as members. The claimant was Mrs F Aderele and the respondent was Outward Housing Trading As Outward Ltd.
The judgment records three claims and all were not upheld: unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, and unlawful deduction from wages. No further written reasons are set out in the record of the decision.
The note at the end states that reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing, and written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the record. No remedy was awarded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.