Case 2303523/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Portch v Mr Michael Cooper Mr Laurence Willard Mr Gordon Dunford Mr Roy Harrison as members of St Mary’s Mens Social Club Heard — 2021
- Case reference
- 2303523/2019
- Decision date
- 11 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pritchard Representation
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent, being the members of St Mary’s Mens Social Club named in the case title, admitted that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed. The Tribunal therefore recorded the unfair dismissal claim as successful and, by consent, ordered compensation of £5,526.36.
The Tribunal also found that the Respondent breached the Claimant’s contract of employment by failing to give notice of termination or to compensate her in lieu of notice. That claim was also resolved by consent, with damages awarded in the sum of £3,827.04.
In addition, the Tribunal found that the Claimant had accrued but untaken holiday outstanding on termination of employment. By consent, the Tribunal ordered payment of £612.00 for holiday pay. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Respondent admitted that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed, and the parties reached consent on compensation in this sum. | Upheld | — | £5,526 |
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal found that the Respondent breached the contract of employment by failing to give notice of termination or pay in lieu of notice; the award was made by consent. | Upheld | — | £3,827 |
| Holiday pay | The Tribunal found accrued but untaken holiday remained outstanding on termination and ordered payment by consent. | Upheld | — | £612 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,965
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.