Case 2303531/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Kajtoch v Transport for London — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303531/2019
- Decision date
- 19 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyde Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Kajtoch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mrs P Kajtoch brought proceedings against Transport For London under case number 2303531/2019.
The tribunal dismissed the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The judgment does not set out factual findings, legal reasoning, or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The gov.uk listing categories indicate unfair dismissal, race discrimination and sex discrimination, but the judgment text does not separately identify adjudicated claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. This claim type is inferred from the listing category because the judgment itself does not separately list the claims. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. This claim type is inferred from the listing category because the judgment itself does not separately list the claims. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.