Case 2303532/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Zenith Christopher Astell v True Love Never Dies Limited Sitting: at London South (by CVP) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303532/2023
- Decision date
- 14 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tueje Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Zenith Christopher Astell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was first found to have been brought out of time. The Tribunal granted an extension of time on the basis that it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to be presented in time and that it had been presented within a reasonable period, so the claim was allowed to proceed.
On the merits, the Tribunal found the holiday pay claim well-founded. It held that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant in accordance with regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant the gross sum of £475.78. No separate split of the award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The Tribunal granted an extension of time because it found it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to be presented in time and that it was presented within a reasonable period. It then found the holiday pay claim well-founded under regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £476 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £476
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.