Case 2303546/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Y Geraghty v Ole Ole Tapas — 2022
- Case reference
- 2303546/2022
- Decision date
- 9 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Y Geraghty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Corrigan found Ms Y Geraghty's claim for unlawful deduction of wages against OLE OLE TAPAS to be well-founded. The respondent was ordered to pay £494, subject to appropriate deductions for tax and National Insurance.
The judgment also recorded an additional payment of £123.50, described as a 25% uplift because the respondent unreasonably breached the ACAS Code of Practice in respect of the claimant's grievance. The total sum ordered to be paid was £617.50, subject to tax and National Insurance deductions on the £494 element.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the unlawful deduction of wages claim well-founded and ordered payment of £494, subject to appropriate deductions for tax and National Insurance. It also ordered an additional £123.50, described as a 25% uplift for the respondent's unreasonable breach of the ACAS Code of Practice in relation to the claimant's grievance. | Upheld | — | £494 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £618
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.