Case 2303552/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 2303552/2019
- Decision date
- 8 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Andrews Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a breach of contract claim for a fundraising bonus of £31,500. The bonus letter dated 18 December 2017 provided that the bonus would be payable only if he remained employed and was not under notice of termination as at 31 March 2019. The tribunal held that any notice referred to in that letter had to be written notice, because the employment terms required notice of termination to be in writing.
The tribunal found that at a meeting on 25 January 2019 the claimant was told orally, but not in writing, that his employment was being terminated by reason of redundancy and that termination would take effect within three months unless alternative employment was found. That oral notice was not enough to defeat the bonus entitlement. However, the tribunal found that the claimant was sent and received a letter dated 9 March 2019 giving written notice that his employment would terminate on 31 October 2019, and that he was therefore under notice by 31 March 2019.
Because the claimant was under written notice by the contractual cut-off date, his entitlement to the fundraising bonus fell away and the claim failed. The tribunal therefore dismissed the claim. It also recorded that the claimant’s employment ended early on 9 October 2019 when the respondent shortened the notice period. Costs were not determined, but the respondent was given liberty to apply for a separate costs hearing if it wished to pursue that issue.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for unpaid fundraising bonus of £31,500. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994
- ordinary principles of contract law
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.