Case 2303561/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs W Pointer v Kent Old People’s Housing Society Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303561/2018
- Decision date
- 5 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Freer Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs W Pointer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 30 July 2020, the Tribunal gave Mrs W Pointer an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 11 May 2020 and because the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that she failed to make written representations, or failed to make sufficient representations, explaining why strike-out should not follow, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Regional Employment Judge Freer struck out the claim. The judgment states that the hearing fixed for 9 to 12 November 2020 would not take place. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole after the claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 30 July 2020 and the earlier order dated 11 May 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole after the claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 30 July 2020 and the earlier order dated 11 May 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.