Case 2303563/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs F Christo v Kingsman Property Limited (in liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303563/2019
- Decision date
- 3 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cheetham QC
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs F Christo
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs F Christo brought a claim for unauthorised deduction of wages, holiday pay and notice pay. The hearing on 3 February 2020 was listed to determine what sums, if any, were payable.
The tribunal recorded that the claim form had not been served because the address for service was incorrect. The claimant had been asked on 7 November 2019 to provide an alternative address but did not do so. The tribunal also noted that a Companies House search showed the respondent was in liquidation.
In any event, the claimant did not attend the hearing and did not inform the tribunal why she would not be attending. In the absence of evidence to prove the claims, and putting aside any issues arising from the respondent's insolvency, the tribunal dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was part of a wider claim for unauthorised deduction of wages, holiday pay and notice pay; no separate award was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim was part of a wider claim for unauthorised deduction of wages, holiday pay and notice pay; no separate award was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Included the pleaded notice pay element. The tribunal dismissed the claim without determining any sums payable. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.