Case 2303566/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Josephine Martin v Prestige Nursing & Care Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303566/2021
- Decision date
- 18 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Josephine Martin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary issue hearing before Employment Judge E Fowell, held by video at Croydon on 18 July 2023. The tribunal first held that Ms Josephine Martin had never been an employee of Prestige Nursing & Care Limited, and for that reason the claims of unfair dismissal and automatically unfair dismissal were dismissed.
The tribunal then considered the claim based on making a protected disclosure. It accepted that the complaint had been made outside the normal time limit, but found that the acts or failures complained of were part of a series ending on 20 November 2020. On that basis, and taking account of the claimant's lack of awareness of the applicable time limits until after her resignation on 26 July 2021, the tribunal held that it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time and that it had been brought within a further reasonable period.
The tribunal also dealt with the victimisation claim on a limitation basis. It held that, on the claimant's case taken at its highest, the alleged acts amounted to conduct continuing over a period ending on 20 November 2020 and that it was just and equitable to extend time. The tribunal said it had not been possible in the time available to determine finally whether there was such a series of acts or whether the conduct extended over a period, and noted that it could revisit that issue at the final hearing if necessary. The detriment and victimisation claims were listed to proceed to a hearing on 18 December 2023.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that at no point was the claimant an employee of the respondent, so the claims of unfair dismissal and automatically unfair dismissal were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The detriment claim based on making a protected disclosure was presented outside the normal time limit, but the tribunal held that, because the alleged acts or failures were part of a series ending on 20 November 2020, it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time and it was brought within a further reasonable period. The merits were not decided at this hearing and the claim was listed to proceed. | Other | — | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation claim was also out of time, but the tribunal extended time on the basis that the alleged acts amounted to conduct continuing over a period ending on 20 November 2020 and that it was just and equitable to do so. The merits were not decided at this hearing and the tribunal noted it could revisit the point at the final hearing. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- not reasonably practicable
- just and equitable extension
- series of similar acts or failures
- conduct continuing over a period
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.