In person For the v Respondent — 2020

Case reference: 2303568/2018
Decision date: 3 March 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Freer Appearances

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In person For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a preliminary hearing on 7 February 2020, Employment Judge Freer considered the Claimant's disability discrimination complaints, including a reasonable adjustments claim and a discrimination arising from disability claim. The tribunal held that the reasonable adjustment claim was capable of forming a continuing act with the later discrimination arising from disability claim.

The tribunal also found that, in any event, it was just and equitable to extend time for the Claimant to bring the failure to provide reasonable adjustments claim, so the tribunal had jurisdiction to consider it. The judgment records no merits determination and no remedy.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal held that the Claimant's reasonable adjustment claim was capable of forming a continuing act with the later discrimination arising from disability claim, and in any event it was just and equitable to extend time so the tribunal had jurisdiction to consider the reasonable adjustment claim.	Other	Disability	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.