Case 2303604/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person (attended) Ms K Durham (Merseyside Employment Law) For the v Ms R Edwards (Manager) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303604/2018
- Decision date
- 4 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Davis Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person (attended) Ms K Durham (Merseyside Employment Law) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an Employment Tribunal judgment dated 4 March 2019 in case 2303604/2018, heard at London South before Acting Regional Employment Judge P Davies. The judgment records that the claimant, Ms D Douglas-Brown, appeared in person and that Ms K Durham of Merseyside Employment Law attended for the claimant, with Ms R Edwards appearing for the respondent.
The only claim identified in the judgment text is unfair dismissal. The tribunal states that, upon withdrawal by the claimant, the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability, does not refer to any remedy, and does not set out any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that, upon withdrawal by the claimant, the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.