Case 2303608/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Bennett v Done Brothers (Cash Betting) Limited t/a Betfred — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303608/2021
- Decision date
- 27 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Wright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Bennett
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr G Bennett did not attend the hearing on 25 July 2023 and had not sought an adjournment despite being given adequate notice. Employment Judge D Wright, sitting alone, found that the Claimant had failed to comply with case management orders dated 30 November 2022 and 27 April 2023 by not providing a schedule of loss, not complying with disclosure directions, and not providing a witness statement.
The tribunal found that the Claimant was not actively pursuing the claim. The Respondent's application to strike out the claim under Rules 37(1)(c) and 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 was allowed, and the claim was struck out. The written judgment records no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying causes of action. It records only that the Claimant's claim was struck out under Rules 37(1)(c) and 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rules 37(1)(c) and 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.