Case 2303627/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Farrow v Laing O’Rourke Services Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 2303627/2018
- Decision date
- 14 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Farrow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment text records that the case was withdrawn by the claimant and that the proceedings were dismissed. No merits findings are given in the text supplied, and no factual or legal analysis appears beyond the dismissal following withdrawal.
Because the claim was withdrawn, the tribunal did not determine the substance of the underlying complaints in the extracted text. No remedy was awarded, and no monetary figures are recorded. The available text also does not identify any legal test applied or any panel members beyond Employment Judge Date.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The extracted text does not set out a merits determination on this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The extracted text does not set out a merits determination on this claim. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The extracted text does not set out a merits determination on this claim. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.