Case 2303628/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. B. Alsaadi v Astral Property Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303628/2018
- Decision date
- 26 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage Representation
- Venue
- London South Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. B. Alsaadi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South Croydon on 26 March 2019 before Employment Judge Sage. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal recorded that the respondent was Astral Property Services Limited.
The tribunal found that the claimant was not an employee or a worker. That finding was central to the outcome because it meant the employment-based claims could not succeed on the facts found by the tribunal.
The claimant's claims for unfair dismissal, unauthorised deduction from wages, holiday pay, and failure to provide payslips were found not well founded and were dismissed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide payslips / written pay statement claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.