Case 2303628/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L McKie v Tenterden Schools Trust — 2026
- Case reference
- 2303628/2020
- Decision date
- 24 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L McKie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal considered whether the claim should be struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. It wrote to the claimant on 27 January 2026 warning that strike-out was being considered because it appeared the claim had not been actively pursued.
The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant did not reply.
In the absence of any response, Employment Judge Andrews struck out the claim on 24 March 2026. No substantive findings on the underlying merits were made, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it appeared not to have been actively pursued. The claimant did not respond to the Tribunal's letter of 27 January 2026 and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.